You should look for a standards-compliant Identity provider if you need Single Sign-On (SSO), for example. If you expose your API to third parties, you can leverage the benefits of a standard authorization approach such as OAuth 2.0. Leverage Auth0’s authentication https://remotemode.net/ and authorization services in your .NET applications. Actually, that token has a proprietary format, although you can partially decode it. Read this article if you want to learn more about what’s inside the access and refresh tokens issued by the Identity API.

• Perhaps the simple token format for the Identity API is enough for your needs.
• However, this may sound somewhat contradictory, since many have complained about the complexity of Identity Server in simple authentication scenarios.
• The point is, does your application really need the JWT format for access tokens?
• However, the current trend in authentication for SPAs seems to be token-based rather than cookie-based, and ASP.NET Core Identity didn’t support it.
• Cookie-based authentication is the typical approach used by the traditional server-side rendered web page model.
• This is the model used by ASP.NET Core MVC and Razor Pages, to put it bluntly.

Don’t follow the trend without carefully analyzing your needs and what ASP.NET Core Identity can offer you. Perhaps the simple token format for the Identity API is enough for your needs. The JWT format was invented to share information between two trusted parties.

Token-based authentication

Your application receives the result of the requested operation in the form of a JWT and it can verify that this information was actually issued by that entity by validating the token’s signature. To be precise, only OpenID Connect defines a JWT-based format for ID tokens. OAuth 2.0 doesn’t recommend a specific format for access tokens, although one is available.

• While you can technically create a base page and inherit from that in your Razor pages, there isn’t the level of support and reuse that you get when developing an enterprise application using the MVC pattern.
• Actually, the ASP.NET Core Identity framework uses the cookie-based authentication approach for ASP.NET Core MVC and Razor Pages applications.
• You’ve likely also been frustrated working with a web application that is slow to load.
• This will help you avoid overdesign and make an informed choice about the right approach.
• Technically, your application is a first-party application, and even OAuth best practices recommend using this approach.
• The one part of Razor Page-based web applications that blocks us from using them at scale in large applications is the friction required to achieve code reuse through inheritance.

Actually, the ASP.NET Core Identity framework uses the cookie-based authentication approach for ASP.NET Core MVC and Razor Pages applications. With these types of applications, each request triggers a complete reload .net razor developer of the entire web page in the browser. In previous versions of .NET, if you wanted to leverage the ASP.NET Core Identity built-in authentication pages in your SPA, the user experience would be disrupted.

.NET 8: What’s New for Authentication and Authorization

The Get and Post methods plus routing parameters are in the code-behind file for the view. It creates a lower barrier to entry than its MVC counterpart, and I find it works great for smaller applications. The point is, does your application really need the JWT format for access tokens? If so, your scenario may be different from what the Identity API was designed for. In a first-party scenario, your server should have all the information it needs to make authorization decisions.

The existing .NET 7 short-term support release is supported until May 2024, and the previous .NET 6 long-term support is supported until June (RHEL 7) and November 2024 (RHEL 8 and 9). Additional support life cycle details are available on the .NET Life Cycle page. The new inspections in Dynamic Program Analysis that target ASP.NET Core frameworks are available in the Early Access Program for ReSharper and JetBrains Rider. Give them a try, and see if you can find any issues in your MVC actions, Razor Pages, or ViewComponents. You can double-click the icon in the status bar (or press Alt+Enter and then View ASP issues) to open a new tool window and see the inspections that were triggered. The different tabs will show potential issues with Memory Allocation, Database, or in this case, ASP.NET.

RED HAT DEVELOPER

A Blazor application will need a RESTful service to provide its data, authorization/authentication and so on. For example, security is a very different paradigm than Razor Pages or MVC. But for many C#/ASP.NET (Core) Developers, that would be a brand-new requirement to resolve. I’m not saying one is better than the other, but they are very different paradigms in a lot of the development and deployment details. ASP.NET Core Identity can be the right solution if you need to build an application with basic authentication needs. Your users are authenticated locally, you don’t expect much traffic and therefore don’t plan to scale anytime soon, you don’t have complex custom authentication needs.